www.lambeth.ch
 
 
   
   
 

Fraud, embezzlement and corruption within the NHS: Lambeth PCT and GMC involved in fraud on patients

Abstract:
Medical directors of Lambeth NHSPrimary Care Trust, London, Dr Alex Jamieson, Dr Shera Chok and Mrs F Wellburn as well as the General Medical Counsil (GMC) embezzled shares of patients. They have financed private companies by ordering “expert opinion” on GPs, lacking any worth. An independent investigative commission found that the trio has used financial shares of patients in 2007 in order to finance Nina Murphy Associates – a private company - on a regular base by ordering worthless  “expert opinions”. Said “expert opinions” cost up to 20,000 £ plus tax per piece which is paid from financial shares of patients. From the investigation it cannot be overlooked that part of the costs were returned to the mandators of Lambeth NHS PCT, in terms of bribes.

The case:
The independent commission under the leadership of  PRT-MALTA (advised by Dr. Zierer, MD, PhD, MSc) surfaced an “expert opinion” on the medical work of a locum-GP  from Nottingham, Hucknall Road, Bulwell requested from Nina Murphy Associates and mandated by Dr Jamieson (GMC-No 1348769) and Dr Chok (GMC-No 4021250) from Lambeth NHS PCT. Initiator was the pharmacist of Bulwell, Nottingham City, Mr Steven Walker. Scrutinising said “expert opinion” according to GMC standards of Good Medical Practice, the independent commission found that said “expert opinion” was a science fiction report with no proof of evidence. Most of the data on patients was fabricated. The independent investigation found that Nina Murphy Associates  (www.ninamurphyassociates.co.uk) consists of a day trader from the London stock exchange, Mr Glen Ridout, with expert experiences on handling, statistics. A further member is a retired nurse, Mrs Sheeylar Macey, and finally a GP, Dr Sadru Kheraj. Besides Dr Kheraj, all members of said Nina Murphy Associates do not have any medical degree, however performing expert medical work – and writing expert medical invoices regarding their work. Mr G Ridout, the expert on statistics from the London stock exchange and the nurse Mrs S Macey allegedly checked the records of patients in Nottingham City the GP allegedly has mismanaged – according to concerns of pharmacist Mr S Walker. No effects of evidence were presented, neither on patients nor whether Nina Murphy Associates had indeed looked at the records of patients of concern in Nottingham City. The medical records of such patients were allegedly presented to Dr S Kheraj of Nina Murphy Associates, who was not capable of understanding the notes.  For several times the independent commission on patient`s right PRT-MALTA requested effects of evidence on such complaints raised by the pharmacist Mr S Walker from Bulwell Nottingham. However all parties involved, i.e. Nottingham City NHS PCT, Lambeth NHS PCT, and the GMC declined. Further, the independent commission PRT-MALTA found that it is common practice by members of the administration of the GMC, i.e. Mr GUY WILKINSON, to use non-professionals for evaluation of doctor`s medical work and “transform” such statements into high paid “expert reports”. Based on such procedures - which can be regarded as falsification and fraud – it was found that money was directed from the patient`s shares into the pockets of Nina Murphy Associates on a regular base. Such fraud costs approximately 20,000 £ plus tax (i.e. travel expenses London-Nottingham, hotel, retrieval and collecting of patients data, analysing such data based on the medical history, statistical analysis, and, writing up the final report). Lambeth NHS PCT refused to lay open the accounts on such “expert opinions” financed by the shares of patients. However it can be assumed that the costs are in the range of the hundreds of thousands of pounds per year which are retrieved from patients shares on such grounds. Then the money is distributed among the trade partners of Lambeth NHS PCT – all this under the cover of the administration of the GMC. Not surprising, the GMC refused to start an investigation on the accused fraud and embezzlement of the shares of patients against the mandators Dr A Jamieson, Dr S Chok and Mrs F Wellburn from Lambeth NHS PCT. In contrast to both the NHS and GMC all statements are documented by effects of evidence.

Comments:
The procedures empoyed by both the NHS and GMC are typical for legal transfer of money from one account to another by producing virtual derivatives. This procedure can be used for money laundering. We know such proedures from stock exchange and the B2B (i.e. business-to-business). Not surprising, Mr Glen Ridout is an exceptionally gifted day trader from the London stock exchange with a reputation in statistics. He managed the virtual data of the cost intensive “medical expert opinion” which the patients had to pay for. In general such type of money-transfer is based on technical reports in concert with statistics. Such “technical expert opinion” is generally difficult to understand by both the public and controllers within the NHS or GMC. In the case documented the NHS ordered a medical expert opinion on data which were regarded as being non-public. External experts were excluded, and more interesting the GMC refused to check the reality of the “medical expert opinion”. More interesting for the public, such costs are not showing up on the accounts of the NHS. From the data presented it can be concluded that the system of money-transfer employed by both the NHS and GMS can be regareded as being safe and intelligent. However in times of shortness of funding the public should openly request an effective, i.e. independent system of controlling, preventing such type of transaction.

 
  «